Trump Draws Red Lines for Iran Deal: No Sanctions Relief Before Final Agreement

Washington – Profile News
U.S. President Donald Trump said the United States will not release frozen Iranian assets or lift sanctions imposed on Tehran before a final agreement is reached, while indicating that ongoing negotiations with Iran have made significant progress. He stressed, however, that any settlement must include the complete abandonment of nuclear ambitions before an agreement can be finalized.
Trump made the remarks in an interview with NBC News, details of which were reported by Reuters. He said his administration does not intend to provide Iran with any advance economic incentives, emphasizing that sanctions and frozen assets will remain sources of leverage until a comprehensive agreement is reached.
Trump also said he does not require Lebanon to be part of any short-term agreement with Iran, a notable statement as Washington continues to support the Lebanon-Israel agreement and monitor de-escalation arrangements along the Lebanese front.
▪️ Trump: No sanctions relief or release of frozen Iranian assets before a final agreement.
▪️ Washington and Tehran are approaching an agreement, according to the U.S. president.
▪️ Trump is pushing for additional safeguards to prevent Iran from circumventing any future deal.
▪️ Lebanon is not a condition in any short-term agreement with Iran.
▪️ U.S. forces will remain in the region until a final settlement is achieved.
Why Is Washington Holding Firm on Sanctions and Frozen Assets?
According to Trump, lifting sanctions or releasing Iranian funds before a final agreement is reached would deprive Washington of one of its most important sources of leverage in the negotiations. As a result, the U.S. administration maintains that any sanctions relief must be part of a comprehensive settlement that includes clear commitments from Iran.
The position comes as negotiations related to the Iranian nuclear program continue, which remains at the core of disagreements between Washington and Tehran despite recent military and political developments.

What Did Trump Say About a Potential Agreement With Iran?
The U.S. president said that the United States and Iran are “very close” to reaching an agreement, but noted that he is seeking additional provisions to ensure Tehran cannot circumvent any future arrangement.
He added that Iran has acknowledged it will not possess nuclear weapons, but said he wants stronger guarantees to ensure the durability of any agreement that is reached. Trump also noted that negotiations still require time because of the complexities of a relationship that has spanned decades.
What Is the Significance of Excluding Lebanon From a Temporary Agreement?
Trump’s comments regarding Lebanon carry particular significance because they come at a time of intensive discussions about the future of de-escalation along the Lebanese-Israeli border and the implementation of existing security understandings.
Observers say separating the Lebanese track from a temporary agreement with Iran could reflect a U.S. preference for addressing regional issues individually, allowing efforts aimed at maintaining stability in Lebanon to continue independently of the complexities surrounding the Iranian nuclear file.
Is Washington Moving Toward an Agreement or Escalation?
Despite saying that an agreement may be close, Trump stressed that the United States will maintain its military presence in the region until a final settlement is reached, reiterating that preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon remains a strategic priority for his administration.
He also said his red line would be a failure of negotiations or a lack of rapid progress toward an agreement, indicating that the military option remains available if diplomatic efforts stall.
What Could Be the Impact on the Region?
The remarks come as regional capitals closely monitor the outcome of U.S.-Iran negotiations and their implications for several issues, including the Hormuz crisis, maritime security, and global energy markets.
Any progress in the talks is widely viewed as a factor that could help reduce regional tensions. Conversely, failure could push the region into a new phase of political and military escalation, with potential consequences for Lebanon, the Gulf, and the global economy.
Source: Reuters and NBC News.








