Victory with the taste of defeat and defeat with the taste of victory

By Tamara Haddad

Despite the fact that the majority of the judges of the International Court of Justice came from countries friendly and allied to the State of Israel, the issuance of a decision to accept the request of the Republic of South Africa with regard to precautionary measures and the rejection of Israel’s request to dismiss the case in the case filed by South Africa confirms that the International Court of Justice responded to the humanitarian goals of the tragedy of the Palestinian people, and responded to the demands of the peoples that called for an end to the Holocaust against the Palestinian people, and the issuance of an urgent decision to take immediate measures to prevent destruction in the Gaza Strip and to take all Measures to prevent genocide in Gaza Israel should report to the Court on the interim measures imposed within a month indicating that it is a rare and unique decision that embodied the consensus of the international, moral and professional collective conscience of the judges of the major powers who voted in favor of the resolution, which reflects the view of the human reality, and another indication that the consensus of the judges indicates the professionalism, independence and courage of the judges in making a decision that was not expected to be accepted by all. The expectation was half plus one to take action. Urgent and precautionary measures He imposed emergency measures that Israel must bring humanitarian aid to civilians into the Gaza Strip.
But those who analyze more deeply will notice that the orders that were approved did not take a mandatory character, and also came in response to part of the precautionary measures demanded by South Africa, and that the most important item demanded by the Republic of South Africa, which is the cessation of hostilities or military or a ceasefire, was not approved by the Court, which the Republic of South Africa has repeatedly affirmed in its pleadings before the International Court of Justice, and that the issuance of a statement by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of South Africa, “Nalithi Balzour”. That the Palestinian people should not lose hope and it was supposed to be a ceasefire on Gaza and that all the orders that came out will not succeed without a ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, this statement is a reference to the fall of the central item, which is the cessation of aggression on Gaza and that the urgent measures that came out only to prevent harm to civilians and that the orders were formulated in a consensual manner so that they are not rejected by the consensus of the judges because they are humanitarian and affect the civil and life reality in The sector did not include South Africa’s main demand for an immediate cessation of war Israel was not condemned directly, despite the Court’s demand for immediate action with regard to the release of detainees held by the Palestinian resistance, also those who analyze in depth see that they are orders that are not flavored or formulated with certainty or immediate commitment, but a specific period has been given that Israel submits within a month a report on the extent to which it carried out the measures that came out and referred to by the International Court of Justice on Israel, and I believe that Israel will implement this decision in a twisting manner by establishing a humanitarian truce, which was leaked Information about it a few days ago, specifically that the decision of the International Court of Justice did not produce explicit clarifications of the ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, and this is what worried the occupation, so Israel will continue its war on the Strip, and there may be from time to time a humanitarian truce within the truces phase to evade any legal obligations it will face in the future, specifically that the orders that came out will be preliminary to prosecute Israel in the future, given that the main case presented by the Republic of South Africa is about Israel’s violation of the Genocide Convention. It is still in place, it is true that it will take years until this case is decided, but Israel will face problems It is internal that will divide its existence, not the realm of international law.